After the COVID-19 pandemic halted many asylum procedures throughout Europe, fresh technologies are actually reviving these types of systems. Right from lie diagnosis tools examined at the edge to a program for verifying documents and transcribes interviews, a wide range of technology is being used in asylum applications. This article is exploring www.ascella-llc.com/generated-post how these technologies have reshaped the ways asylum procedures are conducted. That reveals how asylum seekers will be transformed into pressured hindered techno-users: They are asked to conform to a series of techno-bureaucratic steps and to keep up with unforeseen tiny changes in criteria and deadlines. This obstructs their capacity to browse through these systems and to follow their right for protection.
It also illustrates how these kinds of technologies are embedded in refugee governance: They help in the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a whirlwind of dispersed technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity by hindering these people from being able to view the channels of proper protection. It further states that studies of securitization and victimization should be coupled with an insight into the disciplinary mechanisms of them technologies, in which migrants will be turned into data-generating subjects so, who are disciplined by their reliability on technology.
Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal knowledge, the article argues that these technology have an natural obstructiveness. There is a double impact: although they help to expedite the asylum procedure, they also generate it difficult for the purpose of refugees to navigate these types of systems. They are simply positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes all of them vulnerable to bogus decisions of non-governmental celebrities, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their cases. Moreover, they will pose fresh risks of’machine mistakes’ which may result in incorrect or discriminatory outcomes.